1. The rights to travel; The right to Mode of Conveyance; The Right to Locomotion are all absolute rights, and the Police can not make void the exercise of rights. State v. Armstead, 60 s. 778, 779 and 781:
2. The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental right of which the public and Natural Beings cannot be rightfully deprived. Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago 139 ILL. 46, 28 HE 934, Boone v. Clark 214 SW 67, 25 AM Jur (1st) Highways, sec. 163:
3. The right to Park or Travel is part of the Liberty of which the Natural Person, citizen cannot be deprived without ‘due process of law” under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Kent v Dulles 357 US 116, 125:
4. The Right of a citizen to Travel upon the public highways and to transport one’s property therein, either by carriage or automobile, is not a mere privilege, which a City may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right, which he/she has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Thompson v. Smith 154 E 579:
5. State Police Power extends only to immediate threats to public safety, health, welfare., etc., Michigan v. Duke 266 US, 476 Led. At 449: which driving and speeding are not. California v. Farley Ced. Rpt. 89, 20 Ca 3d 1032 (1971).
6. Traveling in an automobile on the public roads was not a threat to the public safety or health and constituted no hazard to the public, and such a traveler owed nothing more than “due care” (as regards for tort for negligence) to the public and the owner owed no other duty to the public e.g. State), he/she and his/her auto, having equal rights to and on the roadways/highways as horses and wagons, etc.; this same right is still substantive rule, in that speeding, running stop signs, traveling without license plates, or registration are not threats to the public safety, and thus, are not arrestable offenses. Christy v. Elliot, 216 I 131, 74 HE 1035, LRA NS 1905 - 1910; California v. Farley 98 CED Rpt. 89, 20 CA 3d 1032 (1971):
7. Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them. Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436, 125:
8. The Claim and exercise of Constitutional Rights cannot be converted into a crime. Miller v. Kansa 230 F 2nd 486, 489:
Warning
Do not think that just because you obtain a right to travel card and documents, that you will be untouchable. Do not presume that your right to travel documents will make the policy enforcers (police) automatically back off of you. Keep in mind that many of the policy enforcers are here to steal your birthrights, and constitutional rights! These documents only puts them on notice that they are dealing with someone who has knowledge of their rights and likewise the user should be able to stand on those rights. I would not recommend anyone use these documents unless you have knowledge of how to stand on them when the time comes. There will be times where the policy enforcers will back off of you, upon examination of your documents and there will be times wherein you have to stand on them!
The drivers license instrument issued by the corporate "STATE" is not what most people think it is. The drivers license is in actuality a commercial instrument, and granted privilege to deal in commerce on the open highway. The legal term that is used to describe this action is called "operating a motor vehicle." There is a legal distinction between "operating a motor vehicle" and "traveling" which many are unaware of.
USC Title 18, § 31 9(6) - Definition of "Motor Vehicle": "The term "motor vehicle" means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers and property, or property or cargo."
TRAVEL - To go from one place to another at a distance; to journey; spoken of voluntary change of place. White v. Beazley, 1 Barn. & Ald. 171; Hancock v. Rand, 94 N.Y. 1, 46 Am.Rep. 112;
State v. Smith, 157 Ind. 241, 61 N.E. 566, 87 Am.St.Rep. 205.
(Blacks Law 4th Edition)
The legal distinction can be seen clearly within the above definitions! Whenever one is enforcing their right to travel they must NEVER proclaim to be driving or operating a motor vehicle, unless you are transporting someone for hire, like a cab or bus driver. Operating a motor vehicle requires a drivers license but traveling is right! No license is ever necessary to enforce a right!
When the first automobiles were introduced at the start of the 20th century, anyone could drive them without restriction. Just as the earlier carriage or wagon driver needed no license, the first automobile drivers were free to take to the road without the government's permission. Part of this freedom was due to the privacy of early automobile construction--many men and women simply built and attached their own engines to their wagons.
The first driver's licenses were issued in 1903 by Massachusetts and Missouri. These required no examinations of driving skills and were little more than identification cards. As late as the 1930s and 1940s, many states simply instructed the potential driver to pay a small fee of 25 or 50 cents in exchange for a driver's license, which were often sent by mail.
The following court cases below, will also further support the right to travel.
To order your right to travel card with documentation, you will have to send a photo to MHTSoftheworld@gmail.com and fill the information out below. The service fee is $35 on the store page.
STRAW NAME (GOVERNMENT NAME)
Free National Name here
Solar Return (D.O.B)
Height
Weight
Mailing location
Address 1
Address 2
City
Zip
State
Country/Corporation
To order Right to Travel Card
